Posted by Mark Olson on March 22, 2005, 9:35 pm
Odinn wrote:
>
> Cam Penner wrote:
> > In article <1111474819.206522.125020
> > @l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > motorcycleshaftdrive@yahoo.com says...
[snip]
> >>I think the instructor told a white lie when he assured us that
> >>standing on the pegs when approaching an obstacle "lowered the center
> >>of gravity". I (and two other old fogies) objected to that but he
> >>insisted that standing on the pegs lowers the center of gravity of the
> >>system as a whole. Oh well, I wasn't here to argue as putting more
> >>weight on the pegs is a good idea when hitting small obstacles head on
> >>anyway, no matter what the physics is.
> > I'll defer to the physicists on this one. I can't imagine
> > a difference in the COG on the approach (except perhaps
> > raising it slightly as your butt comes off the seat), but
> > as you HIT the object it likely does. Instead of the bike
> > AND you going up over the object, only the bike does. You
> > use your legs as shock absorbers, and lessen the rise of
> > your body. Your body, then, doesn't rise as much, thus
> > decreasing the rise of the COG during impact.
> Okay, I'll help you out just a little.
>
> When you are sitting on the seat, where is that weight distributed? On
> the seat.
> When you are standing on the pegs, where is that weight distributed?
> MUCH lower than the seat, on the pegs.
>
> Remember, we are talking about center of gravity, not center of mass.
>
> Don't argue with me, argue with physics.
Do you have a definition for 'center of gravity' ? I understand the
definition of center of mass. I don't know what 'center of gravity'
means.
The bike is a rigid body (excepting a very small amount of deflection
in the foam of the seat) for the purpose of evaluating this problem...
so other than the slight difference in center of mass (of the bike+
rider) caused by raising the rider's body an inch or so when taking
his weight off the seat cushion, the center of mass is essentially
unchanged despite the rider's weight being carried by the pegs rather
than the seat.
--
Mark '01 SV650S '86 GL1200A '81 CM400T '99 EX250-F13
Posted by Odinn on March 22, 2005, 9:39 pm
Mark Olson wrote:
> Odinn wrote:
>
>>Cam Penner wrote:
>>
>>>In article <1111474819.206522.125020
>>>@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
>>>motorcycleshaftdrive@yahoo.com says...
>
> [snip]
>
>
>>>>I think the instructor told a white lie when he assured us that
>>>>standing on the pegs when approaching an obstacle "lowered the center
>>>>of gravity". I (and two other old fogies) objected to that but he
>>>>insisted that standing on the pegs lowers the center of gravity of the
>>>>system as a whole. Oh well, I wasn't here to argue as putting more
>>>>weight on the pegs is a good idea when hitting small obstacles head on
>>>>anyway, no matter what the physics is.
>
>
>>>I'll defer to the physicists on this one. I can't imagine
>>>a difference in the COG on the approach (except perhaps
>>>raising it slightly as your butt comes off the seat), but
>>>as you HIT the object it likely does. Instead of the bike
>>>AND you going up over the object, only the bike does. You
>>>use your legs as shock absorbers, and lessen the rise of
>>>your body. Your body, then, doesn't rise as much, thus
>>>decreasing the rise of the COG during impact.
>
>
>>Okay, I'll help you out just a little.
>>
>>When you are sitting on the seat, where is that weight distributed? On
>>the seat.
>>When you are standing on the pegs, where is that weight distributed?
>>MUCH lower than the seat, on the pegs.
>>
>>Remember, we are talking about center of gravity, not center of mass.
>>
>>Don't argue with me, argue with physics.
>
>
> Do you have a definition for 'center of gravity' ? I understand the
> definition of center of mass. I don't know what 'center of gravity'
> means.
>
> The bike is a rigid body (excepting a very small amount of deflection
> in the foam of the seat) for the purpose of evaluating this problem...
> so other than the slight difference in center of mass (of the bike+
> rider) caused by raising the rider's body an inch or so when taking
> his weight off the seat cushion, the center of mass is essentially
> unchanged despite the rider's weight being carried by the pegs rather
> than the seat.
>
The center of gravity is a geometric property of any object. The center
of gravity is the average location of the weight of an object.
Relocating the distribution of the weight from the seat to the pegs
lowers the COG.
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/cg.html
--
Odinn
"The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot
do." --Walter Bagehot
Reeky's unofficial homepage ... http://www.reeky.org
'03 FLHTI ........... http://www.sloanclan.org/gallery/ElectraGlide
'97 VN1500D ......... http://www.sloanclan.org/gallery/VulcanClassic
Atlanta Biker Net ... http://www.atlantabiker.net
Vulcan Riders Assoc . http://www.vulcanriders.org
rot13 to reply
Posted by Odinn on March 22, 2005, 10:15 pm
Odinn wrote:
> Mark Olson wrote:
>
>> Odinn wrote:
>>
>>> Cam Penner wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <1111474819.206522.125020
>>>> @l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> motorcycleshaftdrive@yahoo.com says...
>>
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>
>>>>> I think the instructor told a white lie when he assured us that
>>>>> standing on the pegs when approaching an obstacle "lowered the center
>>>>> of gravity". I (and two other old fogies) objected to that but he
>>>>> insisted that standing on the pegs lowers the center of gravity of the
>>>>> system as a whole. Oh well, I wasn't here to argue as putting more
>>>>> weight on the pegs is a good idea when hitting small obstacles head on
>>>>> anyway, no matter what the physics is.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> I'll defer to the physicists on this one. I can't imagine
>>>> a difference in the COG on the approach (except perhaps
>>>> raising it slightly as your butt comes off the seat), but
>>>> as you HIT the object it likely does. Instead of the bike
>>>> AND you going up over the object, only the bike does. You
>>>> use your legs as shock absorbers, and lessen the rise of
>>>> your body. Your body, then, doesn't rise as much, thus
>>>> decreasing the rise of the COG during impact.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Okay, I'll help you out just a little.
>>>
>>> When you are sitting on the seat, where is that weight distributed? On
>>> the seat.
>>> When you are standing on the pegs, where is that weight distributed?
>>> MUCH lower than the seat, on the pegs.
>>>
>>> Remember, we are talking about center of gravity, not center of mass.
>>>
>>> Don't argue with me, argue with physics.
>>
>>
>>
>> Do you have a definition for 'center of gravity' ? I understand the
>> definition of center of mass. I don't know what 'center of gravity'
>> means.
>>
>> The bike is a rigid body (excepting a very small amount of deflection
>> in the foam of the seat) for the purpose of evaluating this problem...
>> so other than the slight difference in center of mass (of the bike+
>> rider) caused by raising the rider's body an inch or so when taking
>> his weight off the seat cushion, the center of mass is essentially
>> unchanged despite the rider's weight being carried by the pegs rather
>> than the seat.
>>
>
> The center of gravity is a geometric property of any object. The center
> of gravity is the average location of the weight of an object.
>
> Relocating the distribution of the weight from the seat to the pegs
> lowers the COG.
>
> http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/cg.html
>
Here, I'll even do one better that deals specifically with motorcycles.
A whole thread on it with it completely explained by none other than
Mark Ketchum (I hope I don't have to explain who he is).
http://www.ketchum.org/cgcm.shtml
--
Odinn
"The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot
do." --Walter Bagehot
Reeky's unofficial homepage ... http://www.reeky.org
'03 FLHTI ........... http://www.sloanclan.org/gallery/ElectraGlide
'97 VN1500D ......... http://www.sloanclan.org/gallery/VulcanClassic
Atlanta Biker Net ... http://www.atlantabiker.net
Vulcan Riders Assoc . http://www.vulcanriders.org
rot13 to reply
Posted by Mark Olson on March 22, 2005, 10:40 pm
Odinn wrote:
>
> Odinn wrote:
> > Mark Olson wrote:
> >
> >> Odinn wrote:
> >>
> >>> Cam Penner wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> In article <1111474819.206522.125020
> >>>> @l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> >>>> motorcycleshaftdrive@yahoo.com says...
> >>
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >>
> >>>>> I think the instructor told a white lie when he assured us that
> >>>>> standing on the pegs when approaching an obstacle "lowered the center
> >>>>> of gravity". I (and two other old fogies) objected to that but he
> >>>>> insisted that standing on the pegs lowers the center of gravity of the
> >>>>> system as a whole. Oh well, I wasn't here to argue as putting more
> >>>>> weight on the pegs is a good idea when hitting small obstacles head on
> >>>>> anyway, no matter what the physics is.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>> I'll defer to the physicists on this one. I can't imagine
> >>>> a difference in the COG on the approach (except perhaps
> >>>> raising it slightly as your butt comes off the seat), but
> >>>> as you HIT the object it likely does. Instead of the bike
> >>>> AND you going up over the object, only the bike does. You
> >>>> use your legs as shock absorbers, and lessen the rise of
> >>>> your body. Your body, then, doesn't rise as much, thus
> >>>> decreasing the rise of the COG during impact.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Okay, I'll help you out just a little.
> >>>
> >>> When you are sitting on the seat, where is that weight distributed? On
> >>> the seat.
> >>> When you are standing on the pegs, where is that weight distributed?
> >>> MUCH lower than the seat, on the pegs.
> >>>
> >>> Remember, we are talking about center of gravity, not center of mass.
> >>>
> >>> Don't argue with me, argue with physics.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Do you have a definition for 'center of gravity' ? I understand the
> >> definition of center of mass. I don't know what 'center of gravity'
> >> means.
> >>
> >> The bike is a rigid body (excepting a very small amount of deflection
> >> in the foam of the seat) for the purpose of evaluating this problem...
> >> so other than the slight difference in center of mass (of the bike+
> >> rider) caused by raising the rider's body an inch or so when taking
> >> his weight off the seat cushion, the center of mass is essentially
> >> unchanged despite the rider's weight being carried by the pegs rather
> >> than the seat.
> >>
> >
> > The center of gravity is a geometric property of any object. The center
> > of gravity is the average location of the weight of an object.
> >
> > Relocating the distribution of the weight from the seat to the pegs
> > lowers the COG.
> >
> > http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/cg.html
> >
>
> Here, I'll even do one better that deals specifically with motorcycles.
> A whole thread on it with it completely explained by none other than
> Mark Ketchum (I hope I don't have to explain who he is).
>
> http://www.ketchum.org/cgcm.shtml
N.B. I am not claiming that putting your weight on the pegs has no effect
on the way the bike handles, simply that it does not change the center of
mass/gravity.
--
Mark '01 SV650S '86 GL1200A '81 CM400T '99 EX250-F13
Posted by Mark Olson on March 22, 2005, 10:30 pm
Odinn wrote:
>
> Mark Olson wrote:
> > Odinn wrote:
> >
> >>Cam Penner wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article <1111474819.206522.125020
> >>>@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> >>>motorcycleshaftdrive@yahoo.com says...
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> >>>>I think the instructor told a white lie when he assured us that
> >>>>standing on the pegs when approaching an obstacle "lowered the center
> >>>>of gravity". I (and two other old fogies) objected to that but he
> >>>>insisted that standing on the pegs lowers the center of gravity of the
> >>>>system as a whole. Oh well, I wasn't here to argue as putting more
> >>>>weight on the pegs is a good idea when hitting small obstacles head on
> >>>>anyway, no matter what the physics is.
> >
> >
> >>>I'll defer to the physicists on this one. I can't imagine
> >>>a difference in the COG on the approach (except perhaps
> >>>raising it slightly as your butt comes off the seat), but
> >>>as you HIT the object it likely does. Instead of the bike
> >>>AND you going up over the object, only the bike does. You
> >>>use your legs as shock absorbers, and lessen the rise of
> >>>your body. Your body, then, doesn't rise as much, thus
> >>>decreasing the rise of the COG during impact.
> >
> >
> >>Okay, I'll help you out just a little.
> >>
> >>When you are sitting on the seat, where is that weight distributed? On
> >>the seat.
> >>When you are standing on the pegs, where is that weight distributed?
> >>MUCH lower than the seat, on the pegs.
> >>
> >>Remember, we are talking about center of gravity, not center of mass.
> >>
> >>Don't argue with me, argue with physics.
> >
> >
> > Do you have a definition for 'center of gravity' ? I understand the
> > definition of center of mass. I don't know what 'center of gravity'
> > means.
> >
> > The bike is a rigid body (excepting a very small amount of deflection
> > in the foam of the seat) for the purpose of evaluating this problem...
> > so other than the slight difference in center of mass (of the bike+
> > rider) caused by raising the rider's body an inch or so when taking
> > his weight off the seat cushion, the center of mass is essentially
> > unchanged despite the rider's weight being carried by the pegs rather
> > than the seat.
> >
>
> The center of gravity is a geometric property of any object. The center
> of gravity is the average location of the weight of an object.
>
> Relocating the distribution of the weight from the seat to the pegs
> lowers the COG.
>
> http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/cg.html
To regurgitate a common phrase from Halliday and Resnick's _Physics_:
"What is really meant is mass, but historically the term weight was
in use"
The NASA website is accurately describing how to calculate the center
of mass of an object, but they are using the term 'center of gravity'
instead of 'center of mass', presumably to conform to terms familiar to
a K-12 student.
I don't expect to convince you, but any 2nd year engineering student
should be able to understand, and hopefully actually calculate, (given
equations or finely divided volumetric data to describe the density
function and the shape of a bike and a human body) how the center of
mass of a bike and rider does not change simply by whether the rider is
supporting himself on the seat or the pegs, assuming he's only raising
his butt an inch or so off the seat. Certainly putting your weight on
the pegs never *lowers* the center of mass or center of gravity, take
your pick, it *raises* it. That's because in order to take the weight
off your butt, you have to push yourself off the seat slightly, which
raises your body's, and hence the combined bike+rider system's, center
of mass (or gravity, if you prefer).
--
Mark '01 SV650S '86 GL1200A '81 CM400T '99 EX250-F13
> Cam Penner wrote:
> > In article <1111474819.206522.125020
> > @l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > motorcycleshaftdrive@yahoo.com says...
[snip]
> >>I think the instructor told a white lie when he assured us that
> >>standing on the pegs when approaching an obstacle "lowered the center
> >>of gravity". I (and two other old fogies) objected to that but he
> >>insisted that standing on the pegs lowers the center of gravity of the
> >>system as a whole. Oh well, I wasn't here to argue as putting more
> >>weight on the pegs is a good idea when hitting small obstacles head on
> >>anyway, no matter what the physics is.
> > I'll defer to the physicists on this one. I can't imagine
> > a difference in the COG on the approach (except perhaps
> > raising it slightly as your butt comes off the seat), but
> > as you HIT the object it likely does. Instead of the bike
> > AND you going up over the object, only the bike does. You
> > use your legs as shock absorbers, and lessen the rise of
> > your body. Your body, then, doesn't rise as much, thus
> > decreasing the rise of the COG during impact.
> Okay, I'll help you out just a little.
>
> When you are sitting on the seat, where is that weight distributed? On
> the seat.
> When you are standing on the pegs, where is that weight distributed?
> MUCH lower than the seat, on the pegs.
>
> Remember, we are talking about center of gravity, not center of mass.
>
> Don't argue with me, argue with physics.