Posted by The Older Gentleman on November 29, 2009, 5:43 am
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:41:56 +0000, totallydeadmailbox@yahoo.co.uk (The
> Older Gentleman) wrote:
>
> |>
> |>> C'mon. There's a great reason to use car tires on a bike - you don't
> |>> need a sidestand any more.
> |>
> |>Ah! The Gold Cup for Common Sense goes to Turby :-)
>
> It could be, my ride has a side stand ignition cut-off *ignition
> linked side stand switch* that is quite inconvenient at times, then lifting
> some 500lbs becomes a bit of a trip after a while.
>
> I done it 1,000 times, for checking/changing the oil, and any other
> maintenance, were the back wheel is required to not touch the ground when
> revving of the CVT is required......
> The bike seems to get heavier all the time, and a lot ppl with
> Yamaha Majesties 2003-->2010 seem to bitch about it a lot and seek a
> disabler/bypass to the ignition linked side stand switch.
>
> The ignition linked side stand is a bit of an inconvenience, so not
> using the side stand and not having to use the center stand seems like a
> good idea in theory.
>
So do what everyone else does and disconnect the sidestand switch.
And now ask the question: if a rear tyre is so broad and flat that a
bike can sit upright on it, how good will it be in corners?
Oh, did you deliberately set the follow-up to "poster" and your own
email addie instead of the ngs, or was it a mistake?
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
Posted by M.Badger on November 25, 2009, 8:33 am
R. LaCasse wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:40:06 -0600, otakuiam@webtv.net (Animeniac) wrote:
>
> |>
> |>If a tire with a tube has a cracked sidewall, is it critical to replace
> |>it?
Yes
> |>
> Critical? replace it when it needs it.
Which is now.
>
> |>In another case, I recently noticed my CH80 front has cracked sidewalls.
> |>It is tubeless however, so I figure it isn't safe even at city speeds.
> |>
> I don't think the smaller tires scoot tires of 11" and less have
> real m/cycle sidewalls, since the tires are about the same as Cessna and
> Piper/Cub light aircraft landing tyres.....
Eh?
> It doesn't really matter in that tyre size,
Oh yes it does.
> since some ppl use car
> tyres on m/cycles and it all works just almost as good and cost much less,
> as a lot of youtube m/cycle tyre performance videos have shown.
Which is relevant how?
>
> Car tyres slip more rather than the thick soft rubber of harder
> sidewalled m/cycle tyres.
>
Posted by Bob on November 27, 2009, 3:06 am
|>>If a tire with a tube has a cracked sidewall, is it critical to replace
|>>it?
|>
|>Is there a question here ?
I'm not sure either, the "question is vague" and ambiguous, but it's
what this whole thread was based on.......replace it as you see fit, a tube
is not going to save your ass at 100kph+.....
Maybe ask the originate poster Message-ID:
seems to have disappeared after his questions..
Bob
Posted by R. LaCasse on November 29, 2009, 3:00 pm
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:40:06 -0600, otakuiam@webtv.net (Animeniac) wrote:
|>
|>If a tire with a tube has a cracked sidewall, is it critical to replace
|>it?
|>
Critical? replace it when it needs it.
|>In another case, I recently noticed my CH80 front has cracked sidewalls.
|>It is tubeless however, so I figure it isn't safe even at city speeds.
|>
I don't think the smaller tires scoot tires of 11" and less have
real m/cycle sidewalls, since the tires are about the same as Cessna and
Piper/Cub light aircraft landing tyres.....
It doesn't really matter in that tyre size, since some ppl use car
tyres on m/cycles and it all works just almost as good and cost much less,
as a lot of youtube m/cycle tyre performance videos have shown.
Car tyres slip more rather than the thick soft rubber of harder
sidewalled m/cycle tyres.
--
National Association of Assault Research
Soul Yamaha Majesty400 2005, Grey, Night Rider!
(http://*remove*boblacasse.150.com/scooter.html)
http://*remove*pages.istar.ca/~vampire/YamyMajesty400.jpg
Posted by Bob on November 30, 2009, 5:52 am
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:03:10 +0000, you wrote:
|>
|>> The ignition linked side stand is a bit of an inconvenience
|>
|>So do what lots of people (includeing me) do or have done: disconnect
|>the switch.
|>
After 5 years with it (yamy-majesty 400 yp400ts), I'm still
outweighing the possibility of using the side stand ignition cutoff as an
added anti-theft utility.
It's not that heavy if your pepped up enough... and lift-->swing
your top body right to lower the center stand.
|>> so not
|>> using the side stand and not having to use the center stand seems like a
|>> good idea in theory.
|>
|>And that brings us back to our start: how well do you think a bike, with
|>'flat' tread like that, will corner?
I seen vids of it cornering from a camera at the bottom of a
M/cycle, .the sidewalls flatten as you turn...no skids, which means that car
tyres can used if there is nothing else on the planet.
Bob
> Older Gentleman) wrote:
>
> |>
> |>> C'mon. There's a great reason to use car tires on a bike - you don't
> |>> need a sidestand any more.
> |>
> |>Ah! The Gold Cup for Common Sense goes to Turby :-)
>
> It could be, my ride has a side stand ignition cut-off *ignition
> linked side stand switch* that is quite inconvenient at times, then lifting
> some 500lbs becomes a bit of a trip after a while.
>
> I done it 1,000 times, for checking/changing the oil, and any other
> maintenance, were the back wheel is required to not touch the ground when
> revving of the CVT is required......
> The bike seems to get heavier all the time, and a lot ppl with
> Yamaha Majesties 2003-->2010 seem to bitch about it a lot and seek a
> disabler/bypass to the ignition linked side stand switch.
>
> The ignition linked side stand is a bit of an inconvenience, so not
> using the side stand and not having to use the center stand seems like a
> good idea in theory.
>