Posted by Mark B on August 15, 2008, 9:07 am
Hi All,
Have a round of your favorite on me. This is not the classic "Which
Harley should I get?" thread. I'm in the market for a Road Glide.
While I'd really love one of the new '09's, I just can't come up with
that kind of coin so I'm looking in the used market. I found two in my
range and I'm looking for input as to the pro's and con's of either
one.
Bike 1: 2003 with 26k miles.
Bike 2: 2005 with 37k miles.
Both bikes are fuel injected w/ stage 1. First impression tells me to
go for the one with lower miles but I know that there have been
updates to the bike over those two model years. I just don't know if
there was anything significant.
Thanks for any ideas.
Mark B
Posted by Stone on August 15, 2008, 10:38 am
> Hi All,
> Have a round of your favorite on me. This is not the classic "Which
> Harley should I get?" thread. I'm in the market for a Road Glide.
> While I'd really love one of the new '09's, I just can't come up with
> that kind of coin so I'm looking in the used market. I found two in my
> range and I'm looking for input as to the pro's and con's of either
> one.
> Bike 1: 2003 with 26k miles.
> Bike 2: 2005 with 37k miles.
> Both bikes are fuel injected w/ stage 1. First impression tells me to
> go for the one with lower miles but I know that there have been
> updates to the bike over those two model years. I just don't know if
> there was anything significant.
> Thanks for any ideas.
> Mark B
Upgrades on Harleys? Bwhaaaaaa! ;-)
Posted by Mark B on August 15, 2008, 2:34 pm
> > Hi All,
> > Have a round of your favorite on me. This is not the classic "Which
> > Harley should I get?" thread. I'm in the market for a Road Glide.
> > While I'd really love one of the new '09's, I just can't come up with
> > that kind of coin so I'm looking in the used market. I found two in my
> > range and I'm looking for input as to the pro's and con's of either
> > one.
> > Bike 1: 2003 with 26k miles.
> > Bike 2: 2005 with 37k miles.
> > Both bikes are fuel injected w/ stage 1. First impression tells me to
> > go for the one with lower miles but I know that there have been
> > updates to the bike over those two model years. I just don't know if
> > there was anything significant.
> > Thanks for any ideas.
> > Mark B
> Upgrades on Harleys? Bwhaaaaaa! ;-)
Stone? You're still around? I guess I must be going deaf because I
haven't heard you blowing your own horn lately.
Posted by Ryder Rick on August 15, 2008, 11:08 am
> Hi All,
>
> Have a round of your favorite on me. This is not the classic "Which
> Harley should I get?" thread.
Yes it is.
--
Ryder Rick
<>
Posted by AH#104 on August 15, 2008, 11:13 am
>> Have a round of your favorite on me. This is not the classic "Which
>> Harley should I get?" thread.
> Yes it is.
> Ryder Rick
No, it's not.
It's a valid question with an answer that is hard to find based on the
physical differences in older model years.
Wish I could help, but I'm not sure what the differences are between the
'03 and '05 touring models.
ASSHOLE#104 Len
> Have a round of your favorite on me. This is not the classic "Which
> Harley should I get?" thread. I'm in the market for a Road Glide.
> While I'd really love one of the new '09's, I just can't come up with
> that kind of coin so I'm looking in the used market. I found two in my
> range and I'm looking for input as to the pro's and con's of either
> one.
> Bike 1: 2003 with 26k miles.
> Bike 2: 2005 with 37k miles.
> Both bikes are fuel injected w/ stage 1. First impression tells me to
> go for the one with lower miles but I know that there have been
> updates to the bike over those two model years. I just don't know if
> there was anything significant.
> Thanks for any ideas.
> Mark B