Posted by Willie Lambert on February 26, 2008, 12:13 pm
You all better watch what text messages you send. Someone might be
reading what you wish someone wasn't.
http://tinyurl.com/3be67u
Posted by Bob La Londe on February 26, 2008, 12:24 pm
> Willie Lambert wrote:
>> You all better watch what text messages you send. Someone might be
>> reading what you wish someone wasn't.
>> http://tinyurl.com/3be67u
> All part of the plan to make us safer through careful oversight by our
> government masters.
> Once we do away with those pesky individual rights altogether we'll all be
> perfectly safe.
Or not.
Posted by me on February 26, 2008, 12:44 pm
>Willie Lambert wrote:
>> You all better watch what text messages you send. Someone might be
>> reading what you wish someone wasn't.
>> http://tinyurl.com/3be67u
>All part of the plan to make us safer through careful oversight by our
>government masters.
>Once we do away with those pesky individual rights altogether we'll all
>be perfectly safe.
what part of this is not understood?
"Prosecutors obtained the contents of the archived text messages by
sending a grand jury subpoena to SkyTel"
sound like there were no "rights" violated to me..
FLF SENS BS AH
www.bikershut.net -
Posted by Steve Irving on February 26, 2008, 12:50 pm
me@nospam.com wrote:
>
>> Willie Lambert wrote:
>>> You all better watch what text messages you send. Someone might be
>>> reading what you wish someone wasn't.
>>> http://tinyurl.com/3be67u
>> All part of the plan to make us safer through careful oversight by our
>> government masters.
>>
>> Once we do away with those pesky individual rights altogether we'll all
>> be perfectly safe.
>
> what part of this is not understood?
>
> "Prosecutors obtained the contents of the archived text messages by
> sending a grand jury subpoena to SkyTel"
>
> sound like there were no "rights" violated to me..
I don't know....this part bothered me somewhat:
"the acquisition of these messages by a grand-jury subpoena without a search
warrant violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment.... to the extent 18
U.S.C. Section 2703 of the Stored Communications Act authorized obtaining the
text messages without probable cause and a search warrant, it violated his
Fourth Amendment rights."
This part of the appeal was never heard by the court since the cops had enough
other evidence to overwhelmingly prove their case.....so it became moot.
But......
Since when does a grand jury subpoena replace a court ordered search warrant,
which would require probably cause??????
--
Steve Irving - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.nite.com/bike.html
"A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight and
understanding." Marshall McLuhan
Posted by me on February 26, 2008, 1:02 pm
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:50:36 -0700, Steve Irving
>me@nospam.com wrot
>I don't know....this part bothered me somewhat:
>"the acquisition of these messages by a grand-jury subpoena without a search
>warrant violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment.... to the extent 18
>U.S.C. Section 2703 of the Stored Communications Act authorized obtaining the
>text messages without probable cause and a search warrant, it violated his
>Fourth Amendment rights."
>This part of the appeal was never heard by the court since the cops had enough
>other evidence to overwhelmingly prove their case.....so it became moot.
>But......
>Since when does a grand jury subpoena replace a court ordered search warrant,
>which would require probably cause??????
does a grand Jury subpoena need a search warrant?, I don;t see why.
but I'm no lawyer, if so and they get off over that "technicality" I'm
sure glad they didn't kill one of our kids, cause they could be
walking over it.
FLF SENS BS AH
www.bikershut.net -
XML Sitemap
>> You all better watch what text messages you send. Someone might be
>> reading what you wish someone wasn't.
>> http://tinyurl.com/3be67u
> All part of the plan to make us safer through careful oversight by our
> government masters.
> Once we do away with those pesky individual rights altogether we'll all be
> perfectly safe.