Posted by Thumper on April 17, 2007, 1:42 pm
3,308 US Service men dead, as well?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6563048,00.html
Not a good day for Bu$h lovers.
Doesn't seem like a good thing for the Republicons, either.
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=politics&idR17770
Mission Accomplished!
--
By it's very nature, my sig. makes this posting 100% on topic.
"Of course, you'll have the good taste not to mention that I posted this."
Thumper
"I don't want a pickle..."
http://www.thumpers-roadhouse.ws
2007 H-D FXSTD Deuce
2006 Buell Ulysees
2006 BMW K1200GT
2004 H-D Road King Classic
1978 Triumph T140V Bonneville
1975 Triumph T160 Trident
1974 Norton Commando Interstate
1969 BSA R75 Red Rocket III
1962 Triumph T20 Tiger Cub
1958 BSA Super Bantam COCK
1954 Velocette MAC
Posted by Henry on April 17, 2007, 8:48 pm
Thumper wrote:
> 3,308 US Service men dead, as well?
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6563048,00.html
>
> Not a good day for Bu$h lovers.
> Doesn't seem like a good thing for the Republicons, either.
>
>
> http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=politics&idR17770
> Mission Accomplished!
The 3,308 doesn't even cont the tens of thousands of soldiers
who have suffered horrific injuries that will affect them for
the rest of their lives. They signed up to defend their country,
but instead are killing and dying for the lies, hate, and greed
of cowardly, treasonous war criminals, war profiteers, torturers,
and child butchering terrorists.
--
http://911research.wtc7.net
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type !
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm
Posted by tomorrow@erols.com on April 17, 2007, 9:22 pm
> Thumper wrote:
> > 3,308 US Service men dead, as well?
> >http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6563048,00.html
> > Not a good day for Bu$h lovers.
> > Doesn't seem like a good thing for the Republicons, either.
> >http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=politics&idR17770
> > Mission Accomplished!
> The 3,308 doesn't even cont the tens of thousands of soldiers
> who have suffered horrific injuries that will affect them for
> the rest of their lives. They signed up to defend their country,
> but instead are killing and dying for the lies, hate, and greed
> of cowardly, treasonous war criminals, war profiteers, torturers,
> and child butchering terrorists.
No, they are not. I work with many brave military personnel, and
not one of them is killing for, and none of them have been wounded for
any of the lies that you endlessly spew.
You should be deeply ashamed of yourself.
Posted by Alan Moore on April 17, 2007, 9:47 pm
On 17 Apr 2007 18:22:38 -0700, "tomorrow@erols.com"
>> Thumper wrote:
>> > 3,308 US Service men dead, as well?
>>
>> >http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6563048,00.html
>>
>> > Not a good day for Bu$h lovers.
>> > Doesn't seem like a good thing for the Republicons, either.
>>
>> >http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=politics&idR17770
>> > Mission Accomplished!
>>
>> The 3,308 doesn't even cont the tens of thousands of soldiers
>> who have suffered horrific injuries that will affect them for
>> the rest of their lives. They signed up to defend their country,
>> but instead are killing and dying for the lies, hate, and greed
>> of cowardly, treasonous war criminals, war profiteers, torturers,
>> and child butchering terrorists.
It also fails to count the civilian contractors who also continue to
die in support of this utterly bogus alternative to a policy. Nor does
it include the hundreds of thousands of innocents killed, crippled or
displaced.
>No, they are not. I work with many brave military personnel, and
>not one of them is killing for, and none of them have been wounded for
>any of the lies that you endlessly spew.
My son was over there. He didn't kill for that reason, either. But he
did leave the service, which he had planned to make a career. Now he's
an engineer.
>You should be deeply ashamed of yourself.
So why, in your world, did Bush send them there, and why does he
insist that they continue to die?
Al Moore
DoD 734
Posted by tomorrow@erols.com on April 17, 2007, 9:59 pm
> So why, in your world, did Bush send them there, and why does he
> insist that they continue to die?
They were sent to oust Saddam Hussein. They stay there to prevent
Iran and/or Syria and untold tens of thousands of terrorist trainees
from setting up camp in the chaos that would ensue if the U.S. were to
leave now.
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6563048,00.html
>
> Not a good day for Bu$h lovers.
> Doesn't seem like a good thing for the Republicons, either.
>
>
> http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=politics&idR17770
> Mission Accomplished!