Posted by wismel on June 4, 2009, 11:33 am
If the video is reposted it would be enlightening to many of us who
missed the original posting. I tried but site not available. Pictures
can be enhanced and I can get experts to examine and determine
if the subject is a full-blooded indian, a person of mixed race, or is
White.
Thanks
ted
Posted by =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BF?= on June 4, 2009, 11:53 am
On Jun 4, 8:33 am, wis...@yahoo.com wrote:
> If the video is reposted it would be enlightening to many of us who
> missed the original posting. I tried but site not available. Pictures
> can be enhanced and I can get experts to examine and determine
> if the subject is a full-blooded indian, a person of mixed race, or is
> White.
Hey! Why does it matter whether Don's wife is full-blooded Indian or
racially mixed?
She is the person she is, she doesn't have to meet anybody's
expectations, and nobody has to "prove" anything about her for the
idle curiousity of strangers.
The real issue in my mind, is *why* does Don *repeatedly* use his wife
and children as *bait* so he can label other people as "racist"?
A person of ordinary sensibilities wants to *protect* his personal
relationships from the scrutiny of strangers.
There's something really *sick* about Don, in my opinion.
Posted by Datesfat Chicks on June 4, 2009, 12:08 pm
On Jun 4, 8:33 am, wis...@yahoo.com wrote:
> If the video is reposted it would be enlightening to many of us who
> missed the original posting. I tried but site not available. Pictures
> can be enhanced and I can get experts to examine and determine
> if the subject is a full-blooded indian, a person of mixed race, or is
> White.
>Hey! Why does it matter whether Don's wife is full-blooded Indian or
>racially mixed?
>She is the person she is, she doesn't have to meet anybody's
>expectations, and nobody has to "prove" anything about her for the
>idle curiousity of strangers.
>The real issue in my mind, is *why* does Don *repeatedly* use his wife
>and children as *bait* so he can label other people as "racist"?
>A person of ordinary sensibilities wants to *protect* his personal
>relationships from the scrutiny of strangers.
>There's something really *sick* about Don, in my opinion.
Nah, the issue is you. Do you know how lewd and misguided it is to further
investigate the racial composition of someone for the reasons that you folks
are?
This whole thing (white/black/Indian/native American) is irrelevant. The
definition of a species is a group that can breed together. Human beings
are all one species.
These discussions have as much merit as me claiming that my short-haired cat
is somehow special and shouldn't be allowed to socialize with or have
kittens with a long-haired cat.
Don is the normal one.
Datesfat
Posted by martin.secrest220 on June 4, 2009, 2:32 pm
wrote:
> On Jun 4, 8:33 am, wis...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > If the video is reposted it would be enlightening to many of us who
> > missed the original posting. I tried but site not available. Pictures
> > can be enhanced and I can get experts to examine and determine
> > if the subject is a full-blooded indian, a person of mixed race, or is
> > White.
> >Hey! Why does it matter whether Don's wife is full-blooded Indian or
> >racially mixed?
> >She is the person she is, she doesn't have to meet anybody's
> >expectations, and nobody has to "prove" anything about her for the
> >idle curiousity of strangers.
> >The real issue in my mind, is *why* does Don *repeatedly* use his wife
> >and children as *bait* so he can label other people as "racist"?
> >A person of ordinary sensibilities wants to *protect* his personal
> >relationships from the scrutiny of strangers.
> >There's something really *sick* about Don, in my opinion.
> Nah, the issue is you. Do you know how lewd and misguided it is to further
> investigate the racial composition of someone for the reasons that you folks
> are?
> This whole thing (white/black/Indian/native American) is irrelevant. The
> definition of a species is a group that can breed together. Human beings
> are all one species.
> These discussions have as much merit as me claiming that my short-haired cat
> is somehow special and shouldn't be allowed to socialize with or have
> kittens with a long-haired cat.
> Don is the normal one.
> Datesfat- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Don is an ignorant peasant who lacks the guts to repost the video in
question. The
quality, and no surprise, is very poor.
Also, consider the varieties among species in appearance and traits.
For example,
Blacks have, in general, a quickness in athletics due to muscle cell
configuration
and structure. (suggest Jon Entin's book "The Last Taboo") By every
testing
standard scientists recognize that the American Black IQ is appx. 85.
Sub-Saharan
Blacks average about 70. Many delude themselves into thinking there is
one set
of genetic rules for the animal kingdom and another for homo sapiens.
Martin
Posted by Rkleinsch1216128 on June 4, 2009, 6:00 pm
On Jun 4, 11:32 am, martin.secrest...@gmail.com wrote:
) By every
> testing
> standard scientists recognize that the American Black IQ is appx. 85.
> Sub-Saharan
> Blacks average about 70.
And if you were smart like the Asians, you would realize that
whatever statistics you're looking at are talking about a mean,
and that within every ethnic group, there are plenty of people
smarter than you.
XML Sitemap
> missed the original posting. I tried but site not available. Pictures
> can be enhanced and I can get experts to examine and determine
> if the subject is a full-blooded indian, a person of mixed race, or is
> White.