(OT) LA Times Endorsement

Main Motorcycle Forum - Motorcycles and related products and laws. 

Page 1 of 12       1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
(OT) LA Times Endorsement L 10-18-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by L on October 18, 2008, 1:48 pm
FYI, this is the first time in at least 30 years that the LA Times has
endorsed a candidate

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-endorse19-2008oct19,0,5198206.story



L



Posted by Twibil on October 19, 2008, 3:24 pm

> I repeat: Southern California is strongly pro-Obama, so the LA Times has =
to
> go along with that.

It was dumb the first time you said it; and saying it twice doesn't
make you look any smarter.

(A) Southern California is the conservative half of the state:
*Northern* California is strongly pro-Obama.

(B) The *other* southern California papers -which exist in the very
same markets and sell their papers to the same buyers- are not paying
any attention to your claim that they're going to *have* to endorse
Obama just because they publish in southern California. The Riverside
"Press-Enterprise", for instance, came out endorsing McCain this very
morning.

Therefore; (C) do you suppose that it might be that the Times
Editorial Board came to their own conclusions for their own reasons
and endorsed Obama strictly on what they consider to be his his merits
instead of simply caving in to what *you* consider to be public
pressure? And that you're simply whining about a political endorsement
that you don't care for?

If not, you're going to have to explain why those other publications
see no reason to cater to what you mistakenly think are the southern
California public's preferences in politicians, but the L.A. Times
*does*.

Snort.

Posted by B. Peg on October 21, 2008, 9:35 am
> "Twibil" wrote:
>> I repeat: Southern California is strongly pro-Obama, so the LA Times has
>> to
>> go along with that.

> It was dumb the first time you said it; and saying it twice doesn't
> make you look any smarter.

> (A) Southern California is the conservative half of the state:
> *Northern* California is strongly pro-Obama.

With all the Hollywood types living along the coast, I'd also say that L.A.
is democratic as well as S.F.

Move inland maybe 5-10 miles and it appears to change to republican.

If you divide California West and East, I would say the West (coastal) would
be definitly democratic and the Eastern portion would fall into the
Republican portion. Not that much difference in a No.and So. diviision;
but East and West - look out!


B~




Posted by Twibil on October 21, 2008, 3:05 pm

> > (A) Southern California is the conservative half of the state:
> > *Northern* California is strongly pro-Obama.
>
> With all the Hollywood types living along the coast, I'd also say that L.=
A.
> is democratic as well as S.F.

Uh, contrary to what you hear from Bill O'Reilly, "all the Hollywood
types" only comprise around 50% of L.A.'s population. The other half
vote conservative, and the population as a whole will vote for
whichever candidate they think is best, political party
notwithstanding. In total, L.A. votes centrist.

> Move inland maybe 5-10 miles and it appears to change to republican.

Well, if you completely ignore the several million staunch Republicans
who dominate the politics of the 100-mile coastal corrider that runs
all the way from Orange County in the north to San Diego in the south,
you might be right if it weren't for the fact that Democrats now
outnumber Republicans in inland San Bernardino County and are making
serious inroads in other inland districts as well...

> If you divide California West and East, I would say the West (coastal) wo=
uld
> be definitly democratic and the Eastern portion would fall into the
> Republican portion. =A0Not that much difference in a No.and So. diviision=
;
> but East and West - look out!

Nope. It's still pretty much a Democratic majority in the north and a
Republican majority in the south


Posted by Vito on October 21, 2008, 5:06 pm
LA Times isn't the only one endorsing Obama. Kadaffi (Lybia) is doing the
same.



Page 1 of 12       1 2 3 > last >>
Similar ThreadsPosted
Classical times January 22, 2008, 9:20 pm
Re: sidecar vs solo lap times June 28, 2007, 4:19 pm
Re: Los Angeles is GONE. LA Times says blacks must go. October 23, 2007, 5:44 pm
OT A Sign Of The Times, I Guess... June 6, 2006, 1:40 am
Let the good times roll....on credit?? March 23, 2008, 12:44 pm
On Display at MotoStars (New York Times) July 26, 2008, 2:07 am
Motorcycles, scooters pollute much more than cars (San Mateo County Times) September 22, 2008, 3:09 am
Re: And if it's "Anonymous" then everyone knows that 9 times out of 10 that it's Skanky pigstypyritejohntoilet gilmer, was Re: Ping: nesnmaine@yahoo.com May 22, 2006, 10:51 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap