Posted by Henry on August 26, 2009, 11:03 am
"A former Scottish police chief has given lawyers a signed statement
claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated.
The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher - has
testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board
crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people."
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid 908
http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/Web%20Pages/FATDAWG_Flight%20103%20The%20Other%20Story.htm
--
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org
Posted by Schiffner on August 26, 2009, 1:19 pm
all lies, everybody knows it was the french you kook job.
Posted by Henry on August 26, 2009, 2:11 pm
Schiffner wrote:
> "A former Scottish police chief has given lawyers a signed statement
> claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated.
>
> The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher - has
> testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board
> crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people."
> http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid 908
>
http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/Web%20Pages/FATDAWG_Flight%20103%20The%20Other%20Story.htm
> all lies, everybody knows it was the french you kook job.
Links and references. please. The psychotic delusions and
rants of a confirmed nutjob carry no weight with your many
betters...
Posted by Vito on August 26, 2009, 2:45 pm
> "A former Scottish police chief has given lawyers a signed statement
> claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated.
> The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher - has
> testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board
> crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people."
I see the same flaw here as in your other notions. Agencies like CIA only
do what profits them. They'd get zip from framing some Libyan. So why
bother?
Posted by Charlie on August 27, 2009, 4:53 am
>> "A former Scottish police chief has given lawyers a signed statement
>> claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated.
>>
>> The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher - has
>> testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board
>> crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people."
>>
> I see the same flaw here as in your other notions. Agencies like CIA only
> do what profits them. They'd get zip from framing some Libyan. So why
> bother?
Without getting drawn into this, I fear that you are being immensely naive.
The framing of 'some Libyan' and Libya itself would have deflected the blame
from other (in my view, far more likely) suspects; that's why they would
bother. After Iraq invaded Kuwait in late 1990, the US and UK needed to
neutralise Iran and Syria (which hosted Iran's unpleasant Palestinian
proxies such as Hezbollah). The last thing they would have wanted was a
united Arab coalition against them, in their determination to liberate
Kuwait. They needed to have widespread Arabic endorsement for this.
Saudi was terrified that they were next in line for invasion. Colonel
Gadaffi had made the error of voicing his support for Saddam Hussein which,
given his past support for such lovable characters as ETA and the IRA, made
him the perfect fall-guy. President Assad subsequently gave Syria's
approval, after having been loved up by our two countries. Odd that, eh?
XML Sitemap
> claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated.
>
> The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher - has
> testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board
> crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people."
> http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid 908
>