Posted by The Older Gentleman on July 12, 2010, 2:11 am
> The engineers at Hinkley probably design their motorcycles ergonomics
> and spring them for a rider that's about 5' 10" and weighs 180~200
> pounds. If they think a bike didn't *need* progressive springs, they
> didn't fit the machine with them.
You know nothing.
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
Posted by Robert Bolton on July 11, 2010, 10:06 pm
>The Older Gentleman wrote:
>>> Would it be worth my while going for these?
>>
>> Yes.
>Thanks for the advice, even if it's a bit terse.
>What does "improved handling and ride" mean in practice?
>And why didn't Triumph make these springs standard
>in the 1st place?
My 1998 Concours had progressive rate springs I think. They were too
soft though, causing the front end to dive big time when ever I
braked. Perhaps the fork type and internal dampers were part of the
problem. All I can tell you for sure was that whenever I used the
front brake with the wife on bike, she ended up on top of me. I
replaced them with straight rate and was much happier. Not only did
the forks no longer bottom out on hard braking, but the steering was
tighter in the corners too. So, to me it seemed progressive was good
for highway touring, and lousy for performance.
Others here have owned the Concours, so maybe they can illuminate.
Robert
Posted by The Older Gentleman on July 12, 2010, 2:11 am
> The Older Gentleman wrote:
>
> >> Would it be worth my while going for these?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Thanks for the advice, even if it's a bit terse.
>
> What does "improved handling and ride" mean in practice?
Generally, a better feel to the front end and less dive on braking.
> And why didn't Triumph make these springs standard
> in the 1st place?
>
Cost
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
> and spring them for a rider that's about 5' 10" and weighs 180~200
> pounds. If they think a bike didn't *need* progressive springs, they
> didn't fit the machine with them.