Posted by Sean_Q_ on October 19, 2009, 5:50 pm
dizzy wrote:
> BrianNZ wrote:
>
>> Common sense drew that line before you typed it.
>
> God damn, you are a brain-dead fscktarded asshole.
>
> Just amazing.
Oh well, Brian, you can't please everyone.
Dizzy's inflammatory comments constitute a line of reasoning called
_ad hominem_, a Latin phrase short for "argumentum ad hominem"
which translates roughly as an "argument against the person".
The proper reply is something like: Utinam logica falsa tuam
philosophiam totam suffodiant. ("May faulty logic undermine
your entire philosophy".)
SQ
Posted by dizzy on October 19, 2009, 8:10 pm
Sean_Q_ wrote:
>Dizzy's inflammatory comments constitute a line of reasoning called
>_ad hominem_, a Latin phrase short for "argumentum ad hominem"
>which translates roughly as an "argument against the person".
I hope for your sake that reading of what BrianNZ wrote would lead you
to a similar conclusion as mine.
Posted by turby on October 18, 2009, 8:22 pm
> Sean_Q_ wrote:
> > BrianNZ wrote:
> >> The officers didn't cause the crash, it was the criminal failing to
> >> pull over for the police that caused the crash....they were just doing
> >> their job.
> > True... but with due care and attention?
> > What if the PIT maneuver in heavy traffic results in the death of
> > an innocent bystander?
> > SQ
> The criminal is at fault for not pulling over.
There was a case locally a couple of days ago...
A woman called the cops and told them her boyfriend was driving a
stolen car. They told her to stay calm, act normally and they'd take
care of it. The perp was near a school, so they waited until they got
in the car and moved out of the area. Then they boxed him in. He tried
to escape, ramming the cop cars. The cops fired numerous shots into
the car. The perp was captured unharmed. The woman who made the call
was shot dead.
Posted by J. Clarke on October 18, 2009, 9:29 pm
turby wrote:
>> Sean_Q_ wrote:
>>> BrianNZ wrote:
>>
>>>> The officers didn't cause the crash, it was the criminal failing to
>>>> pull over for the police that caused the crash....they were just
>>>> doing their job.
>>
>>> True... but with due care and attention?
>>
>>> What if the PIT maneuver in heavy traffic results in the death of
>>> an innocent bystander?
>>
>>> SQ
>>
>> The criminal is at fault for not pulling over.
> There was a case locally a couple of days ago...
> A woman called the cops and told them her boyfriend was driving a
> stolen car. They told her to stay calm, act normally and they'd take
> care of it. The perp was near a school, so they waited until they got
> in the car and moved out of the area. Then they boxed him in. He tried
> to escape, ramming the cop cars. The cops fired numerous shots into
> the car. The perp was captured unharmed. The woman who made the call
> was shot dead.
Wait a minute, there's some crucial information missing here. Was the woman
in the car with the guy and got shot by police, or was she just by some
weird coincidence in the line of fire or did the guy who stole the car shoot
her or what?
XML Sitemap
>
>> Common sense drew that line before you typed it.
>
> God damn, you are a brain-dead fscktarded asshole.
>
> Just amazing.