Posted by Bob Myers on December 18, 2007, 4:16 pm
> No we aren't. We're legal, they aren't.
For what reason? 'Cause "we" are descendants of
the folks who stole this country fair and square from the
natives, or what?
What, exactly, are you so afraid of?
> Deport the criminal beaners.
We COULD just deport ALL the criminals, regardless
of their ethnicity - there'd be a whole lot more elbow room
around here if that happened. Why not support that level
of nonsense instead? I mean, if you believe in this sort of
thing, shouldn't you take it to the natural conclusion?
Bob M.
Posted by Seth Hammond on December 18, 2007, 6:01 pm
> For what reason? ?'Cause "we" are descendants of
> the folks who stole this country fair and square from the
> natives, or what?
We didn't *steal* this land from the natives, we helped the British
kick the French out of north America and then we kicked the British
out of the thirteen original colonies because they wouldn't let us
expand into the Ohio country, among other reasons.
Then we bought the rest of the land from France and Mexico.
-------------------------
Your grasp of history is flawed, at best. We paid little or nothing to
Mexico, and almost all at gunpoint. The rest we just stole outright.
-----------------------
We bought
the land so Americans could settle on it and develop it, we didn't buy
the land to give to the illegal aliens.
----------------------
WE were the first illegal aliens. We only bought what we couldn't steal.
Both indigenes and Spanish/Mexicans had lived here for hundreds of years
before we showed up uninvited. Deal.
--------------------
> We COULD just deport ALL the criminals, regardless
> of their ethnicity - there'd be a whole lot more elbow room
> around here if that happened. ?Why not support that level
> of nonsense instead? ?I mean, if you believe in this sort of
> thing, shouldn't you take it to the natural conclusion?
It's exceedingly difficult to deport someone who was born here of
foreign parents, but it has been done.
------------------------
That's because place of birth determines native status. New natives are
automatically citizens. It's a simple concept.
Posted by Patriot Games on December 19, 2007, 8:23 am
> That's because place of birth determines native status. New natives are
> automatically citizens. It's a simple concept.
Its not so simple. The 14th Amendment needs SCOTUS review.
Posted by Bob Myers on December 19, 2007, 1:55 pm
>> That's because place of birth determines native status. New natives are
>> automatically citizens. It's a simple concept.
> Its not so simple. The 14th Amendment needs SCOTUS review.
What part of the word "amendment" do you have the
most trouble understanding? The SC CANNOT
overturn the 14th, which is why it was done as an
amendment in the first place. It was basically the
legislative branch overruling the judicial, re the Dred
Scott decision (among others).
Bob M.
Posted by Patriot Games on December 19, 2007, 8:22 am
>> No we aren't. We're legal, they aren't.
> For what reason? 'Cause "we" are descendants of
> the folks who stole this country fair and square from the
> natives, or what?
The law is the law. The law ignores history. We're legal, they're not,
they gotta go.
> What, exactly, are you so afraid of?
Absolutely nothing.
>> Deport the criminal beaners.
> We COULD just deport ALL the criminals, regardless
> of their ethnicity - there'd be a whole lot more elbow room
> around here if that happened. Why not support that level
> of nonsense instead? I mean, if you believe in this sort of
> thing, shouldn't you take it to the natural conclusion?
Deport them ALL.