Re: Cyclist at war!

Main Motorcycle Forum - Motorcycles and related products and laws. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Cyclist at war! S'mee 10-19-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by S'mee on October 19, 2008, 1:57 am
wrote:

Elitest scum.

Take that mass what ever the hell you call yourselves and go eat a
spoke sideways.
--
Keith

Posted by Tom Sherman on October 19, 2008, 1:01 pm
S'mee wrote:
> wrote:
>
> Elitest scum.
>
Context man!

> Take that mass what ever the hell you call yourselves and go eat a
> spoke sideways.

I have never participated in a Critical Mass ride and have no plans to.
Judging all bicyclists by Critical Mass is like judging all
motorcyclists by the handful of anti-social criminal gang members.

> --

There needs to be a space after the two dashes, i.e. "-- ".

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the precipitate.

Posted by Jym Dyer on October 19, 2008, 5:51 pm
>>> and > = Tom Sherman

>>> Dude, real bicycles do NOT want bicycle ghetto lanes.
>>> "BananaApe Boy" does NOT speak for cyclists.

=v= Neither does Tom Sherman.

>>> "Bicycle lane" promoters are either misguided or
>>> anti-cyclist.

=v= That statement represents an ideology, not a consensus.
Many "real" bicyclists quite reasonable hold other opinions.

> Judging all bicyclists by Critical Mass is like judging
> all motorcyclists by the handful of anti-social criminal
> gang members.

=v= Absolute bullshit. Tom Sherman's declaration of "criminal
gang member" status is contradicted very directly by a number
of court rulings. In the U.S., in fact, a Federal judge has in
fact ruled that "Participation in the Critical Mass bike ride
constitutes expressive association entitled to First Amendment
protection."
<_Jym_>

--
"There should be 1,000 of you out there, like in San Francisco."
-- Oakland Mayor (and now Attorney General) Jerry Brown


Posted by Tom Sherman on October 19, 2008, 7:09 pm
Jym Dyer wrote:
>>>> and > = Tom Sherman
>
>>>> Dude, real bicycles do NOT want bicycle ghetto lanes.
>>>> "BananaApe Boy" does NOT speak for cyclists.
>
> =v= Neither does Tom Sherman.
>
>>>> "Bicycle lane" promoters are either misguided or
>>>> anti-cyclist.
>
> =v= That statement represents an ideology, not a consensus.
> Many "real" bicyclists quite reasonable hold other opinions.
>
>> Judging all bicyclists by Critical Mass is like judging
>> all motorcyclists by the handful of anti-social criminal
>> gang members.
>
> =v= Absolute bullshit. Tom Sherman's declaration of "criminal
> gang member" status is contradicted very directly by a number
> of court rulings. In the U.S., in fact, a Federal judge has in
> fact ruled that "Participation in the Critical Mass bike ride
> constitutes expressive association entitled to First Amendment
> protection."
> <_Jym_>
>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Cyclist gets it! July 10, 2008, 1:28 am
Re: Cyclist at war! October 15, 2008, 9:00 pm
Re: Cyclist at war! October 15, 2008, 9:01 pm
Re: Cyclist at war! October 15, 2008, 11:38 pm
Re: Cyclist at war! October 16, 2008, 3:21 am
Re: Cyclist at war! October 16, 2008, 3:23 am
Re: Cyclist at war! October 19, 2008, 1:56 am
Re: Cyclist at war! October 16, 2008, 12:32 pm
Re: Cyclist at war! October 18, 2008, 3:52 am
Re: Cyclist at war! October 18, 2008, 3:56 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap