Posted by Spacker on April 29, 2009, 6:21 pm
>> Yes, folks, this group does have its fair share from what we've seen
>> over the past few days...
>>
>> It's all too obvious why they despise honest sellers like Spacker who
>> do not tell lies. And it's also obvious why they've failed *miserably*
>> at providing evidence of these "lies" they claim Spacker says on
>> Usenet. It would be obvious to the bright folk that the conclusion to
>> be drawn by this simple event is: Spacker does not tell lies. Period.
>>
>Or that many of us have grown bored with him and can't be bothered wasting time
answering that sort of question
Is this post a hallucination then?
Posted by Neal Pomphrets on April 29, 2009, 6:49 pm
Spacker wrote :
>> Or that many of us have grown bored with him and can't be bothered wasting
>> time answering that sort of question
> Is this post a hallucination then?
Odd, isn't it....
- That they claim that you're a liar - but produce no evidence to back
it up!
- That they state they have you kill-filed - yet seem to know what
you're on about - and keep mentioning you in every post!
- That they say they're so bored of you but then respond to posts like
this!
- They create user IDs with your posting name, and post on upce, thus
highlighting their fixation / obsession.
Posted by Spacker on April 30, 2009, 5:47 am
youareallmorons@live.co.uk wrote:
>> youareallmor...@live.co.uk formulated the question :
>>
>> >> 'Sylabulchecker' working okay today?
>>
>> > "is that the best you can do?"
>>
>> "imitation is the best form of flattery"
>>
>> > Thinks. Yes, it probably is. Bad luck, you're still a clueless,
>> > inarticulate sock.
>>
>> Still projecting, are we....
>ROFL. Inarticulate and witless to the core, that's Pompous Neil.
>Frankly, I don't know who to hold in the most contempt, Spacker the
>worthless lying mong or Pompous Neil the witless arse-licking mong.
What about someone who needs to use 3 different names in one day to
big themself up?
XML Sitemap
>> over the past few days...
>>
>> It's all too obvious why they despise honest sellers like Spacker who
>> do not tell lies. And it's also obvious why they've failed *miserably*
>> at providing evidence of these "lies" they claim Spacker says on
>> Usenet. It would be obvious to the bright folk that the conclusion to
>> be drawn by this simple event is: Spacker does not tell lies. Period.
>>
>Or that many of us have grown bored with him and can't be bothered wasting time