Posted by The Older Gentleman on January 15, 2011, 7:57 am
> So here is the issue, on another web site a poster claims that he has
> removed the lower fairings on his sport bike to improve stability in
> crosswinds, something about center of gravity and other shit. I figure
> you fellows know all about wind.
>
> Read here:
http://www.reddit.com/r/motorcycles/comments/f24ei/fairing_or_no_fairing
_what_do_you_prefer/
>
> So the poster ttbaja100 got his ass handed to him, but I think he is
> right to call bullshit, I'd just be interested in your take on this.
>
> Hint Beav and TOG know of the fairing removing poster...
>
It's that idiot Krusty, trumpeting his ignorance again.
I gave up reading the thread after his 'paper aeroplane' explanation,
which was so wrong as to be laughable.
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Triumph Street Triple Honda CB400F
Suzuki TS250 Suzuki GN250 chateaudotmurrayatidnetdotcom
Nothing damages a machine more than an ignoramus with a manual, a
can-do attitude and a set of cheap tools
Posted by The Older Gentleman on January 15, 2011, 12:40 pm
> What's the matter? You don't like freedom of speech when it's not you
> exercising it?
Nah. He's angry because another idiocy of his has been exposed in yeat
another place, and yet another nym along with it.
It makes you wonder how many more there are of his, out there.
Viral Krusty - a terrifying thought. A sort of self-replicating source
of bad mechanical advice and incorrect science.
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ERx2 GN250. Only seven bikes now.
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
Posted by Twibil on January 15, 2011, 1:39 pm
wrote:
> I told you ten years ago that I didn't want to debate with you.
And you were quite obviously lying when you said it. Just as you're
lying now.
Were it otherwise, you'd not have been on the losing end of the
several hundrred debates that you've been in with TOG since then.
(Hint: All you have to do to *really* end the debates is stop
replying.)
Posted by schwarzesonne on January 15, 2011, 7:23 pm
> It's impossible that Neil could be following you around because, after
> all, you change names constantly.
> It's probably that, whenever he stumbles across a post containing
> incorrect, dangerous advice... it just so happens to be yours. You
> are quite unique in that respect.
Bullshit.
Posted by schwarzesonne on January 16, 2011, 6:51 am
> Is anyone keeping count of the bullshit?
> There's no clear winner.
But there *is* a clear loser: the motorcycling community loses when
Neil Murray and his friends disrupt a group so badly that newbies quit
answering questions.
For instance, the readership of rech.motorcycles.tech is a mere shadow
of what it was ten years ago.
Murray used to follow Hoyt McKagen from newsgroup to newsgroup ten
years ago, and McKagen asked Murray to stop it just as I have been
asking him to stop.
But Murray gets perverse pleasure from his disruptions, like he is a
delinquent teenager looking for attention.
XML Sitemap
> removed the lower fairings on his sport bike to improve stability in
> crosswinds, something about center of gravity and other shit. I figure
> you fellows know all about wind.
>
> Read here: