Posted by Jared on November 14, 2011, 12:31 am
On 11/13/2011 7:26 PM, saddlebag wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 12, 5:10 pm, Claude Annis<theb...@Use-Author-Supplied-
>>
>>> Address.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 11/12/2011 12:58 PM, krusty kritter wrote:
>>>>> http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coyote_ (mitolog%C3%ADa)
>>
>>>>> http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casta#Sistema_de_castas_del_Imperio_Espa ...
>>
>>>> Wikipedia is a very poor resource to quote. Don't try to use Wikipedia
>>>> with any authority or expect credibility. Better to quote "The Onion."
>>
>>> Go fuck yourself.
>>
>> Pay attention, class - here again, we see the Krusty One's
>> incomparable use
>> of evidence and reason to support his "arguments" when challenged.
>> Truly, a
>> model for us all....
> The argument used against him was bogus. Claude provided zero
> evidence that the articles Krusty provided were inaccurate let alone
> that Wikipedia in general is an incredible source.
Wikipedia is not a source, credible or otherwise.
It's as good or bad as _its_ sources.
If nobody wants to look up the sources, arguing over
whether it's accurate is pointless.
--
Jared
Posted by krusty kritter on November 14, 2011, 9:17 am
> On 11/13/2011 7:26 PM, saddlebag wrote:
> > The argument used against him was bogus. Claude provided zero
> > evidence that the articles Krusty provided were inaccurate let alone
> > that Wikipedia in general is an incredible source.
> Wikipedia is not a source, credible or otherwise.
> It's as good or bad as _its_ sources.
> If nobody wants to look up the sources, arguing over
> whether it's accurate is pointless.
It only takes a few trolls to rustle a thread and drive the herd off
to the bushes so it can be re-branded as something totally different.
The Venezuelan racist Ramon Herrera kicked this thread off because he
didn't understand how Latinos can so easily glorify the villains in
their past and present, but now the discussion has turned to the
credibility of information sources.
Reekyites find it so much easier to attempt to extract their own
version of truth from logic than to look truth in the concensus
reality of what is agreed upon by
researchers.
Posted by The Older Gentleman on November 14, 2011, 2:42 pm
> The Venezuelan racist
Krusty's calling someone a racist.
<Mind explodes>
He'll be calling someone an incompetent mechanic next.
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F
Triumph Street Triple Suzuki Freewind, TS250ERx2, GN250.
So many bikes, so little garage space....
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
Posted by Bob Myers on November 14, 2011, 6:00 pm
On Nov 14, 12:42 pm, totallydeadmail...@yahoo.co.uk (The Older
Gentleman) wrote:
> > The Venezuelan racist
> Krusty's calling someone a racist.
> <Mind explodes>
> He'll be calling someone an incompetent mechanic next.
Well, who better to recognize either? Like pretty much any cliche,
"it takes one to know one" is well grounded in reality.
Bob M.
Posted by Mark Olson on November 14, 2011, 6:14 pm
On 11/14/2011 5:00 PM, Bob Myers wrote:
> On Nov 14, 12:42 pm, totallydeadmail...@yahoo.co.uk (The Older
> Gentleman) wrote:
>>> The Venezuelan racist
>>
>> Krusty's calling someone a racist.
>>
>> <Mind explodes>
>>
>> He'll be calling someone an incompetent mechanic next.
>>
> Well, who better to recognize either? Like pretty much any cliche,
> "it takes one to know one" is well grounded in reality.
Not true, according to Dunning and Kruger:
Kruger, Justin; David Dunning (1999). "Unskilled and Unaware of It:
How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to
Inflated Self-Assessments". Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 77 (6): 1121–34. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121. PMID 10626367
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi .1.1.64.2655&rep=rep1&type=pdf
XML Sitemap
>>> On Nov 12, 5:10 pm, Claude Annis<theb...@Use-Author-Supplied-
>>
>>> Address.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 11/12/2011 12:58 PM, krusty kritter wrote:
>>>>> http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coyote_ (mitolog%C3%ADa)
>>
>>>>> http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casta#Sistema_de_castas_del_Imperio_Espa ...
>>
>>>> Wikipedia is a very poor resource to quote. Don't try to use Wikipedia
>>>> with any authority or expect credibility. Better to quote "The Onion."
>>
>>> Go fuck yourself.
>>
>> Pay attention, class - here again, we see the Krusty One's
>> incomparable use
>> of evidence and reason to support his "arguments" when challenged.
>> Truly, a
>> model for us all....
> The argument used against him was bogus. Claude provided zero
> evidence that the articles Krusty provided were inaccurate let alone
> that Wikipedia in general is an incredible source.