SHARP helmet testing

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
Posted by B. Peg on June 26, 2009, 10:00 pm
 
please rate
this thread
currently rated  
5 out of 5
(1 ratings)
Sort of surprising seeing how they rated different brands vs. DOT and Snell.
The Bell and BMW came out high.  Arai and Shoei middle of the road (!).
Even gave the Nolan N-103 which is a heavy one and very noisy over say Shoei
Mulitech a 4 out of 5 for a flip-face.

Link: http://sharp.direct.gov.uk/search/

B~



Posted by Datesfat Chicks on June 27, 2009, 2:52 am
 
Yeah, the Bells did REALLY well.

What I find interesting is that the U.S. has only pass fail (DOT or not,
Snell or not), but the star rankings among [equivalently] DOT-legal helmets
gives the buyer more information.

Interesting.

Datesfat


Posted by Schiffner on June 27, 2009, 8:50 am
 
Shame their methodology is already be called to question or out right
lambasted. The test teh sides of the helmet, while studies show that
the front of the helmet isn't iirc and anyone who think the top is as
important as the front is delusional.
--
Keith

Posted by Beav on June 28, 2009, 6:53 am
 

Shame their methodology is already be called to question or out right
lambasted. The test teh sides of the helmet, while studies show that
the front of the helmet isn't iirc and anyone who think the top is as
important as the front is delusional.

Yeah, it does look like the tests aren't quite what they seem to be.


--
Beav

VN 750
Zed 1000
OMF# 19



Posted by Schiffner on June 28, 2009, 8:23 am
 
IIRC the gripe on MCN (by readers) was the focus on side impact to the
helmet and not the front  or back.

--
Keith


This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap