Posted by Datesfat Chicks on August 5, 2009, 1:33 pm
2006 Honda Shadow 600.
It is getting time for new tires for me. I've been using Dunlop 404's.
Question #1: What is the best criteria to use for when to replace them? Is
3/32" tread depth the right criterion?
Question #2: My back is worn more than the front. Any thoughts about
replacing or not replacing the front at the same time?
Thanks, Datesfat.
Posted by Rob Kleinschmidt on August 5, 2009, 2:10 pm
wrote:
> 2006 Honda Shadow 600.
> It is getting time for new tires for me. I've been using Dunlop 404's.
> Question #1: What is the best criteria to use for when to replace them? Is
> 3/32" tread depth the right criterion?
> Question #2: My back is worn more than the front. Any thoughts about
> replacing or not replacing the front at the same time?
I usually wear out the back first, so I replace them separately.
The tires ought to have wear bars you could look at
or you could change them when tire wear starts to
affect the handling.
Alternately, I suggest a tread depth of approximately
3.748 mm averaging 10 readings around the center of
the tread, using a recently calibrated digital caliper.
Posted by Nasty Milo on August 5, 2009, 10:34 pm
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:ecef69c8-5fa7-4b0e-a971-f18e0d3abdda@a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Aug 5, 10:33 am, "Datesfat Chicks" <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2006 Honda Shadow 600.
It is getting time for new tires for me. I've been using Dunlop 404's.
Question #1: What is the best criteria to use for when to replace them? Is
3/32" tread depth the right criterion?
Question #2: My back is worn more than the front. Any thoughts about
replacing or not replacing the front at the same time?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I usually wear out the back first, so I replace them separately.
The tires ought to have wear bars you could look at
or you could change them when tire wear starts to
affect the handling.
Alternately, I suggest a tread depth of approximately
3.748 mm averaging 10 readings around the center of
the tread, using a recently calibrated digital caliper.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Oh, BURN. . . . .<br>
</body>
</html>
Posted by The Older Gentleman on August 6, 2009, 2:16 am
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
WebTV?
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER Coo, down to just five bikes!
If you don't know what you're doing, don't do it. And RTFM.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
Posted by Snag on August 5, 2009, 5:52 pm
Datesfat Chicks wrote:
> 2006 Honda Shadow 600.
> It is getting time for new tires for me. I've been using Dunlop
> 404's.
> Question #1: What is the best criteria to use for when to replace
> them? Is 3/32" tread depth the right criterion?
> Question #2: My back is worn more than the front. Any thoughts about
> replacing or not replacing the front at the same time?
> Thanks, Datesfat.
I usually wear out two rears per front . If the wear pattern on the front
is funny , if the handling is weird , or it's badly cupped , replace it . I
figger as long as it handles OK and has enough tread to shed water , I'll
run it .
If that two to one ratio holds , I'll get over 30k on the front ... love
those Dunlop Elite 3's !!
--
Snag
"90 FLHTCU "Strider"
'39 WLDD "PopCycle"
BS 132/SENS/DOF
> It is getting time for new tires for me. I've been using Dunlop 404's.
> Question #1: What is the best criteria to use for when to replace them? Is
> 3/32" tread depth the right criterion?
> Question #2: My back is worn more than the front. Any thoughts about
> replacing or not replacing the front at the same time?