Posted by steve auvache on February 4, 2010, 6:36 pm
In article <90b6d34e-93a3-409c-b378-45d64d3e8030@m35g2000prh.googlegroup
>> So lead by example & show some respect by not crossposting this shite.
>> It really is tedious beyond belief.
>Yes, Neil Murray *is* incredibly tedious.
>But he is also *your* buddy.
>If you want this admittedly stupid shit to stop, get on his case to
>play his games in ukrm.
>Otherwise...
Otherwise??
lol
Come on then big boy, what are you going to do?
--
steve auvache
Posted by Road Glidin' Don on February 4, 2010, 5:55 pm
> > You got called on something you absolutely
> > can't back up. Deal with it.
> NOBODY can back up ANYTHING in this masterdebation/shitwit society,
> and this crap will continue as long as there is no basic respect for
> other riders.
Heh, heh. Are we having "fun" yet, Krusty? Are we? Well, I guess
"we" never did include you, so the answer is a definite "Yes".
Posted by The Older Gentleman on February 4, 2010, 5:59 pm
> NOBODY can back up ANYTHING
I can. I can back up your assertion that valve springs in modern engines
are weak with precisely the same technical explanation I gave earlier.
Unless you'd like to try to back up your assertion with a technical
explanation as to why you were right?
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
Posted by Rob Kleinschmidt on February 4, 2010, 7:40 pm
> > So basically when you said "I did this" and "I did that",
> > this all took place in your imagination ? This is a very
> > simple question.
If I'm wrong, then simply state the 16 valve engine you were
working on when you acquired this experience.
> This business with Neil Murray challenging every message I post has
> NOTHING whatever to do with my experiences working on motorcycles.
I really don't give a rat's ass about your fight with him.
Do you own a modern 16 valve bike which you work on,
and which was the basis for the advice you gave ?
> > An honest person would preface the same advice with
> > "I've read" or "people recommend", without putting on
> > pretensions of expertise they don't possess.
> Oh, now YOU are challenging my *honesty*, as well as my experience,
> and expertise.
In a word, yes.
Posted by =?UTF-8?B?5bqc5a+6? on February 4, 2010, 9:47 pm
> I really don't give a rat's ass about your fight with him.
I'm very disappointed in you for even getting involved in one of Neil
Murray's
farcical debates.
> Do you own a modern 16 valve bike which you work on,
> and which was the basis for the advice you gave ?
In a word, yes.
XML Sitemap
>> It really is tedious beyond belief.
>Yes, Neil Murray *is* incredibly tedious.
>But he is also *your* buddy.
>If you want this admittedly stupid shit to stop, get on his case to
>play his games in ukrm.
>Otherwise...