Where's Hank hiding now?

 It seems the conspiracy got to Popular Mechanics:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=1&c=y

     tony23@dslextreme.com (Tony)
posted: Where's Hank hiding now?
It seems the conspiracy got to Popular Mechanics:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=1&c=y


bjay@webtv.net
Hank is interviewing some new Professors, trying to find one, to write
about the Penetgon being dynomited by some of the office clerks in that
famous building. Because, I imagine Hank, doesnt believe the Jet that
crashed into it, really did all that damage.   :~}

 
~sigh~

I'll say this just once because I know I'm wasting my typing
fingers, but ...


Those "few small random fires" were enough to stuff up the
frame members on one of the top sections of that "massive
steel frame" and then that massive steel frame proved to be
not so "massive" when the weight of the floors above the
collapsing section dropped down onto it. The result was a
concertina effect all the way down.

But, hey, commonsense stuff like that isn't half as much fun
as a conspiracy theory.

By the way, Henry, did you hear that George Bush actually
died in a golfing accident two years ago and has been
replaced by a double. That explains why George made a couple
of good decisions around about then. But the double has got
the role down pat now (although I'm not sure that Pat is
happy about that).


--
Allan Kirk,

 NZMSC wrote:


  "Stuff up the frame members"? I'd ask you to elaborate, but so
far, all the magic fire conspiracy theorists show a remarkable
aversion to facts, details, and hard evidence, so I doubt you're
any different. Emotional nonsense is probably all you've got. <g>
 Can you tell us how the magic fires caused all 58 perimeter columns
in WTC7 to fail totally, instantly, and at exactly the same time.
The southwest corner which was damaged by debris from the north
tower failed at precisely the same time and rate as the undamaged steel frame at
the opposite end of the building. Please explain. You'll
be the first - other than those who correctly attribute WTC7's
collapse to controlled demolition, of course...


 WTC7 failed from the bottom up. You're being silly.
 All steel framed buildings are built with incredible reserve
strength, and can easily support several times their own weight.
You're not making any sense at all. But then, when people attempt
to defend the impossible, making sense isn't an option....


 You wrote complete nonsense, and your NORAD thwarting Arab/magic
fire conspiracy theory is the wackiest conspiracy theory put
forth to date.


 More nonsense. Try again if you ever reach the point where
you're able to address the science, physics, hard evidence,
and details.



--


  http://911research.wtc7.net
  http://www.st911.org


  Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.

  http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

  On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

  http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
  http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
  http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm

 Henry  wrote in


Henry, you are your own worst enemy.

Sadly, somehow you escaped my plonk file.

But I've rectified that now.

So away you go and play your childish games with conspiracy
theories and all those other sorts of "exciting" things.

--
Allan Kirk,
Megarider Organisation,
(Saving motorcyclists' lives since 1971 )
www.megarider.com