Posted by Mike Corey on November 15, 2008, 4:06 pm
>Do other states have unreasonable ins.
> "laws"? Is MO a good state to avoid like the
> Black Plague?
What you described in your full post is similar to the insurance "laws"
here in Illinois. What state are you from now that doesn't require
uninsured motorist? I thought all states / insurance companies had that.
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and
degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing is
worth a war, is worse." --- John Stuart Mill:
Posted by Puddin' Man on November 15, 2008, 5:47 pm
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:06:05 -0600, AWR7MMSTW@webtv.net (Mike Corey) wrote:
>>Do other states have unreasonable ins.
>> "laws"? Is MO a good state to avoid like the
>> Black Plague?
>What you described in your full post is similar to the insurance "laws"
>here in Illinois.
At least y'all have a civilized helmet law.
>What state are you from now that doesn't require
>uninsured motorist?
I didn't say I was in such a state. I'm in MO, but
I'll do my damndest to avoid paying for UIM.
>I thought all states / insurance companies had that.
I thought virtually all states required only liability ins.
UIM is not liability ins. regardless of what you might find
in state statutes.
P
"Take Yo' Hand Out My Pocket (I Ain't Got Nothing What Belongs To You)!"
- Rice Miller, who probably never even _heard_ of GW Bush, Paulson, etc
Posted by Jeff on November 16, 2008, 2:10 am
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:06:05 -0600, AWR7MMSTW@webtv.net (Mike Corey)
> wrote:
>
>>>Do other states have unreasonable ins.
>>> "laws"? Is MO a good state to avoid like the
>>> Black Plague?
>>
>>What you described in your full post is similar to the insurance
>>"laws" here in Illinois.
>
> At least y'all have a civilized helmet law.
>
>>What state are you from now that doesn't require
>>uninsured motorist?
>
> I didn't say I was in such a state. I'm in MO, but
> I'll do my damndest to avoid paying for UIM.
>
>>I thought all states / insurance companies had that.
>
> I thought virtually all states required only liability ins.
> UIM is not liability ins. regardless of what you might find
> in state statutes.
>
True, but UIM is required by law in Indiana. It always seemed a bit
oxymoronic to me that you need insurance against uninsured motorists when
it illegal for them to be uninsured in the first place.
Posted by Puddin' Man on November 16, 2008, 4:15 pm
>> I thought virtually all states required only liability ins.
>> UIM is not liability ins. regardless of what you might find
>> in state statutes.
>>
>True, but UIM is required by law in Indiana.
Thanks. I'm collecting info ...
>It always seemed a bit
>oxymoronic to me that you need insurance against uninsured motorists when
>it illegal for them to be uninsured in the first place.
Yeah, but they are "out there", and they do have "accidents".
To my knowledge, anyone with a standard medical ins. policy is
covered. We pay for both. Anyone that can collect on both, I'll
buy 'em "A Cigar And A Beer". :-)
P
"Take Yo' Hand Out My Pocket (I Ain't Got Nothing What Belongs To You)!"
- Rice Miller, who probably never even _heard_ of GW Bush, Paulson, etc
XML Sitemap
> "laws"? Is MO a good state to avoid like the
> Black Plague?