Posted by zoot on September 17, 2008, 12:37 pm
should be clean and cheap. anyone tried to convert yet? what would it
take?
Posted by . on September 17, 2008, 2:09 pm
> should be clean and cheap. anyone tried to convert yet? what would it
> take?
1. A fearless rider who doesn't mind having a 6000-psi compressed gas
cylinder in close proximity to his family jewels.
2. A special compressor capable of filling the compact pressure bottle
to 6000 psi.
Posted by Blattus Slafaly on September 17, 2008, 5:36 pm
. wrote:
>> should be clean and cheap. anyone tried to convert yet? what would it
>> take?
>
> 1. A fearless rider who doesn't mind having a 6000-psi compressed gas
> cylinder in close proximity to his family jewels.
>
> 2. A special compressor capable of filling the compact pressure bottle
> to 6000 psi.
I'd rather have a turbo diesel bike.
--
Blattus Slafaly ف ٣ :) ⅞
Posted by S'mee on September 17, 2008, 9:03 pm
> > should be clean and cheap. anyone tried to convert yet? what would it
> > take?
> 1. A fearless rider who doesn't mind having a 6000-psi compressed gas
> cylinder in close proximity to his family jewels.
Only partially correct. The problem is NOT the saftey of the tank but
rather the shape. Currently I'm only aware of cylindrical tanks being
made. None mountable in an aceptable manner. 8^( There was a company
in england attempting to make tanks that are usable on a motorcycle.
> 2. A special compressor capable of filling the compact pressure bottle
> to 6000 psi.
LOL no you pull up to a filling station that delivers CNG with no
problems but good try at being a spoil sport.
--
Keith
Posted by . on September 17, 2008, 11:47 pm
> LOL no you pull up to a filling station that delivers CNG with no
> problems but good try at being a spoil sport.
OK, so what pressure does the station deliver the CNG to your tank?
And what does it take, about ten gallons of CNG to go 200 miles?
That's a rather inconvenient cylindrical tank to be straddling...
XML Sitemap
> take?