Posted by Dean H on May 8, 2011, 1:46 pm
also posted over at GasGas rider.org
Hi there,
I'm ready to assemble my 2001 xc300 top end. I have my cylinder just
back from being replated by Langcourt's. They did a nice job. I have
an Athena A size piston kit. I sent the piston, but not the rings,
with the cylinder to Langcourt.
If I drop a ring into the bore to check ring gap, I am seeing about .
014 or.015 inch ring gap (.36 or .38 mm). That looks pretty tight to
my untrained eye, and I don't have a gap spec to check against.
I just wonder if I'll run out of gap when the engine gets hot.
Thanks in advance for a clue or two.
-Dean
Posted by Dean H on May 10, 2011, 3:12 pm
> If I drop a ring into the bore to check ring gap, I am seeing about .
> 014 or.015 inch ring gap (.36 or .38 mm). That looks pretty tight to
> my untrained eye, and I don't have a gap spec to check against.
Sort of a Murphy's law kind of response from Athena. Never provide
extra information when asking a question.
"The difference 0.01 to 0.03mm (0.35 →.38 )in the ring end gap of t=
he
rings doesn’t affect the performance of the engine.
The clearance piston-cylinder wall that we use is from 0.04 to 0.06mm
Thank you"
Posted by Wudsracer on May 13, 2011, 2:17 am
Dean,
You have plenty of end gap for the rings to expand. Not too tight at
all.
Jim
----------------------------------------------------------
>On Tue, 10 May 2011 12:12:30 -0700 (PDT), Dean H wrote:
>>
>> If I drop a ring into the bore to check ring gap, I am seeing about .
>> 014 or.015 inch ring gap (.36 or .38 mm). That looks pretty tight to
>> my untrained eye, and I don't have a gap spec to check against.
>Sort of a Murphy's law kind of response from Athena. Never provide
>extra information when asking a question.
>"The difference 0.01 to 0.03mm (0.35 ?.38 )in the ring end gap of the
>rings doesn’t affect the performance of the engine.
>The clearance piston-cylinder wall that we use is from 0.04 to 0.06mm
>Thank you"
Posted by Dean H on May 13, 2011, 5:27 am
> Dean,
> You have plenty of end gap for the rings to expand. Not too tight at
> all.
> Jim
> ----------------------------------------------------------
Thank you, Jim.
> 014 or.015 inch ring gap (.36 or .38 mm). That looks pretty tight to
> my untrained eye, and I don't have a gap spec to check against.