Posted by Whelan - '02 200exc (x2) & '04 on December 4, 2007, 10:03 am
p235 December issue Dirt Rider:
"Banish Stud Crud"
"Use an antiseize compound on all cylinder head studs to get a more
accurate torque reading."
Didn't we conclude torque specs are based on solvent-cleaned threads
and using antiseize then torquing over-torques?
-Joe
Posted by JayC on December 4, 2007, 12:18 pm
> Didn't we conclude torque specs are based on solvent-cleaned threads
> and using antiseize then torquing over-torques?
I just read something a day or two ago - it specified torque, then re-
specified at -30% when using anti-seize.
Damn, can't remember where I saw that (short term memory loss - I hate
it). If I do, I'll post a link.
JayC
Posted by JayC on December 4, 2007, 12:22 pm
> I just read something a day or two ago - it specified torque, then re-
> specified at -30% when using anti-seize.
> Damn, can't remember where I saw that (short term memory loss - I hate
> it). If I do, I'll post a link.
OK - this isn't where I originally read it, but these guys say 20%,
and they make the crap.
http://www.saftlok.com/safteze/antiseiz/aircraft.htm
JayC
Is replying to your own posts like talking to yourself - and answering?
Posted by JayC on December 4, 2007, 12:30 pm
Even better - an engineering application note for a gizmo that
measures applied torque vs. thread torque vs. axial tension.
They say 10%.
http://www.amti.biz/PDFDownloads/Bolt3applnote.PDF
I'd say back off 15% and call it a day.
JayC
> Is replying to your own posts like talking to yourself - and answering?
No. You're having a conversation with someone else. Shut up! NO,
YOU SHUT UP!!
Posted by Dave Smith on December 4, 2007, 3:08 pm
> p235 December issue Dirt Rider:
> "Banish Stud Crud"
> "Use an antiseize compound on all cylinder head studs to get a more
> accurate torque reading."
> Didn't we conclude torque specs are based on solvent-cleaned threads
> and using antiseize then torquing over-torques?
> -Joe
Another link:
http://www.rockcrawler.com/techreports/fasteners_torque/index.asp
His example toward the end shows a 50% difference in torque to get the same
preload.
> and using antiseize then torquing over-torques?