Posted by Champ on November 9, 2009, 7:12 am
http://www.motomatters.com/news/2009/11/07/motogp_back_to_1000cc_from_2012.html
--
Champ
neal at champ dot org dot uk
Posted by Michael Sierchio on November 9, 2009, 11:01 am
Champ wrote:
> http://www.motomatters.com/news/2009/11/07/motogp_back_to_1000cc_from_2012.html
Can I have a grain of salt with that?
Posted by Julian Bond on November 9, 2009, 2:13 pm
>Champ wrote:
>>
>>http://www.motomatters.com/news/2009/11/07/motogp_back_to_1000cc_from_2
>>012.html
>Can I have a grain of salt with that?
Better than that. You can have an Aprilia RSV4-GP.
I can't imagine Honda, Yamaha or Ducati building production based
machines. So unless production based engines are required, the best this
means is that a WCM will be able to build a race bike with a production
based engine and go round in 10th to 28th and occasionally get lapped.
It might mean that Aprilia and BMW feel they can get involved and I
think an unlimited tuning RSV4 might be almost competitive. But it won't
win.
--
Julian Bond E&MSN: julian_bond at voidstar.com M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173
Webmaster: http://www.ecademy.com/ T: +44 (0)192 0412 433
Personal WebLog: http://www.voidstar.com/ skype:julian.bond?chat
By Golly, It Is The Tooth Fairy!
Posted by Michael Sierchio on November 9, 2009, 6:18 pm
My proposal - strict, ever-decreasing on-board fuel limits.
You don't need a displacement limit, fuel = HP = top speed.
Want to limit those? And advances in fuel management would be
a good technology transfer item for street bikes - we have
traction control already.
[The new MTS 1200 is way cool, as they say in California]