|
Posted by Carl Sundquist on November 3, 2006, 7:07 pm
> Carl Sundquist wrote:
>> http://www.superbikeplanet.com/2006/Nov/061103h.htm
> why?
>
> because some columnist decided to add a clause to a
> sentence that had nothing to do with anything?
Are you sure it has nothing to do with anything?
>
> that paragraph should have been a fact/quote
>
> Spies says the changes the '07 Suzuki Superbike will see at
> the Sepang test are limited, hence he's not going. "I'm going
> to stay here, concentrate on my training and be ready for the
> Daytona test where we'll have more stuff to test," Spies said '
> today upon returning from the Suzuki test at Willow Springs.
>
> seems reasonable - have you ever flown 1.2 around the world & back?
Sounds like spin to me. And yes, I have. In one instance I flew from the US
to Paris for a week, returned to the US for another week, then flew to
Adelaide, Australia for a month. I used to travel a lot, peaking at being
away from home 280 days one year.
> it takes a toll, & if there isn't a good reason I'd skip it too.
Hayden, I can understand, but if the changes to the '07 machine at Sepang
are limited, why is Mladin going? Wouldn't he also benefit from all the
changes the bikes will have at Daytona?
>
> The article also notes that
> Spies has done the Sepang test in the past.
I'm not so sure about that. He missed the trip once after his tire
failure/bad crash at Daytona in 2003.
>
> so It's obvious that if powers insist or Ben sees value in it he
> will fly.
>
> so what in the world made Dean Adams add
>
> Spies, a nervous flier under the best of conditions, says.....
>
> it was him fabricating a slant to the story that isn't based
> on anything but speculation and innuendo.
So answer the question. Why would Adams fabricate a slant to the story? Is
he a Spies-hater?
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap