Posted by New Lateran Treaty on August 11, 2009, 4:21 pm
Whether or not we even rode bikes, there was some inherent interest in
hearing that the Honda had passed the Yamaha, etc etc. Every
spectator knew the bikes. Next year we will hear --- what? I'm
betting announcers will be using rider names only, because team names,
with no need for a "Honda" suffix , will be too unfamiliar.
How many fans can tell you the current 250 TEAM NAMES right now, on
the spot? I think not many.
Yamaha is 55 years and has been winning WC's for 45 years.
Honda is 60 and has been racing for 50 years.
Kwackers since 1961, with WC's since 1969.
We feel we know 'em.
Balatonring. Aeropuerto-Castello-Blusens. Pepe. Matteoni.
I intend no disrepect to the teams who have provided stunning racing
in this and past seasons --- but it's going to be a steep learning
curve, and of course there is no longer a question of "Win on Sunday,
Sell on Monday".
Posted by Champ on August 12, 2009, 3:42 am
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:21:41 -0700 (PDT), New Lateran Treaty
>Whether or not we even rode bikes, there was some inherent interest in
>hearing that the Honda had passed the Yamaha, etc etc. Every
>spectator knew the bikes. Next year we will hear --- what? I'm
>betting announcers will be using rider names only, because team names,
>with no need for a "Honda" suffix , will be too unfamiliar.
>I intend no disrepect to the teams who have provided stunning racing
>in this and past seasons --- but it's going to be a steep learning
>curve, and of course there is no longer a question of "Win on Sunday,
>Sell on Monday".
This is a pretty narrow perspective. And anyway, the 250 class, which
Moto2 is replacing, has effectively been a one make class (Aprilia)
with the occasional Honda, for a few years now.
--
Champ
neal at champ dot org dot uk
Posted by Switters on August 12, 2009, 8:13 am
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:21:41 -0700 (PDT), New Lateran Treaty
>
>>Whether or not we even rode bikes, there was some inherent interest in
>>hearing that the Honda had passed the Yamaha, etc etc. Every
>>spectator knew the bikes. Next year we will hear --- what? I'm
>>betting announcers will be using rider names only, because team names,
>>with no need for a "Honda" suffix , will be too unfamiliar.
>
> This is a pretty narrow perspective. And anyway, the 250 class, which
> Moto2 is replacing, has effectively been a one make class (Aprilia)
> with the occasional Honda, for a few years now.
*ding*
Besides, I don't spend the race listening out for the makes of bikes.
Plus we (in the UK) have different commentary teams proving quite clearly
that it's not just a bit of knowledge that makes you a good commentator.
Posted by PaulpULVITZKA on August 16, 2009, 9:59 am
> And anyway, the 250 class, which Moto2 is replacing, has effectively been a one make class (Aprilia)
> with the occasional Honda, for a few years now.
The difference with the 250's is other makes can field a team if they
want [as KTM did], next year it will be the 100% haonda cup, suppose
we should let them win something...
,> Champ
> neal at champ dot org dot uk
XML Sitemap
>hearing that the Honda had passed the Yamaha, etc etc. Every
>spectator knew the bikes. Next year we will hear --- what? I'm
>betting announcers will be using rider names only, because team names,
>with no need for a "Honda" suffix , will be too unfamiliar.
>I intend no disrepect to the teams who have provided stunning racing
>in this and past seasons --- but it's going to be a steep learning
>curve, and of course there is no longer a question of "Win on Sunday,
>Sell on Monday".