Posted by dezmo on February 5, 2006, 3:32 pm
>>I have taken it on three trips to Southern California (one trip was 1400
>>miles in three days
> This was ALL on a 600 cc bike?
> yes?
What is the problem, 145mph top speed not enough?:)
Posted by me on February 6, 2006, 9:25 am
>> This was ALL on a 600 cc bike?
>>
>> yes?
>What is the problem, 145mph top speed not enough?:)
No that's plenty fast
I just wasn't sure if a 600cc could go all day long on
such a smaller engine.
Posted by Paul Gustafson on February 6, 2006, 9:36 am
>>> This was ALL on a 600 cc bike?
>>>
>>> yes?
>>
>>What is the problem, 145mph top speed not enough?:)
> No that's plenty fast
> I just wasn't sure if a 600cc could go all day long on
> such a smaller engine.
Never even breaks a sweat.
Posted by Ript on February 18, 2006, 4:59 pm
>
>>> This was ALL on a 600 cc bike?
>>>
>>> yes?
>>
>>What is the problem, 145mph top speed not enough?:)
>
> No that's plenty fast
>
> I just wasn't sure if a 600cc could go all day long on
> such a smaller engine.
>
Its not so much the bike, but the rider :)
--
1984 RZ350
Posted by Ript on February 18, 2006, 4:59 pm
@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net:
>
>>
>>>I have taken it on three trips to Southern California (one trip was
1400
>>>miles in three days
>>
>> This was ALL on a 600 cc bike?
>>
>> yes?
>
> What is the problem, 145mph top speed not enough?:)
>
>
>
isnt it usalu a 6000+ rpm buzz for hours that makes it tough on a smaller
bike?
--
1984 RZ350
XML Sitemap
>>miles in three days
> This was ALL on a 600 cc bike?
> yes?